Re: split-subbeam direction

[Spider]

Yes, I don't get that either. That would mean for the first
half of my given measure (in bb.ly),

Lilypond gives this:

            |  |  |  |
            |  |  |  |
            +--+--+--+ 
|--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|--+--+--+    
|  |  |  |
|  |  |  |

but this is correct?

             |  |  |  |
             |  |  |  |
|---+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|---+--+--+  +--+--+--+
|   |  |  |
|   |  |  |

or this?

             |  |  |  |
             |  |  |  |
|---+--+--+  +--+--+--+
|---+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|   |  |  |
|   |  |  |


--- Rune Zedeler <address@hidden> wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> 
> > We recently talked with Paul Roberts,  a notation guru
> that explained
> > to us that it should really be
> > 
> >      |  |  |  |
> >  |----------------|--|--|
> >  |---|--|--|  |---|--|--|  
> >  |                |  |  |  
> > 
> > 
> > (the 1st stem determines the "direction" of the beam)
> 
> I don't understand. Does this mean that
> 
> 
>     |  |
>     |  |
>     | -+
> +--+--+
> +-
> |
> |
> 
> 
> is incorrect and should be
> 
> 
>     |  |
>     |  |
> +--+--+
> +-   -+
> |
> |
> 
> 
> ?
> 
> -Rune
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com