[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ps output looks like junk
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: ps output looks like junk |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Oct 2002 14:28:48 +0200 |
> > How have you looked at the PS file? Did you try to print
> > it out or have you used Ghostview. What version of
> > ghostscript do you use (gs -version)?
> I used Ghostview.
> Here is the output of gs -version
> GNU Ghostscript 6.52 (2001-10-20)
> Copyright (C) 2001 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved.
Did you check the PDF version of your PS file that I did,
to see if it looks OK?
Have you tried printing the file to a printer?
I use exactly the same ghostscript version and the result
looks fine here.
/Mats
- Re: ps output looks like junk, Colin Cotter, 2002/10/01
- Re: ps output looks like junk, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/10/01
- Re: ps output looks like junk, Colin Cotter, 2002/10/01
- Re: ps output looks like junk,
Mats Bengtsson <=
- Re: ps output looks like junk, Colin Cotter, 2002/10/01
- Re: ps output looks like junk, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/10/01
- Re: ps output looks like junk, Colin Cotter, 2002/10/02
- Re: ps output looks like junk, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/10/02
- Re: ps output looks like junk, Colin Cotter, 2002/10/02
- Re: ps output looks like junk, David Raleigh Arnold, 2002/10/01
- RE: ps output looks like junk, Scott Ainsworth, 2002/10/01
- RE: editing chord names (was ps file looks like junk), Colin Cotter, 2002/10/02