[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please test gub
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Please test gub |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jan 2019 01:40:23 +0100 |
Am Mi., 30. Jan. 2019 um 01:28 Uhr schrieb John Mandereau
<address@hidden>:
>
> Hi Harm,
> Le mardi 29 janvier 2019 à 23:47 +0100, Thomas Morley a écrit :
> > Doing
> > $ chromium-browser gub/uploads/webdoc/v2.21.0/index.html
> > None of the tested links seem to work.
> >
> > But for
> > $ chromium-browser gub/uploads/localdoc/v2.21.0/index.html
> > all links seem to work.
> >
> > No clue whether this is expected behaviour or not ...
>
> In order to test contents of gub/uploads/webdoc, you need to serve it
> with a webserver with content negotiation. This is merely FYI; I don't
> suggest spending much energy on testing this particular output (webdoc)
> of GUB; testing binaries, "localdoc", and examining regresssion tests
> comparison, with several branches (master and stable/2.20) have
> certainly a higher priority.
>
> Best
> --
> John Mandereau
Hi John,
thanks for the insight.
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: Please test gub, (continued)
Re: Please test gub, Knut Petersen, 2019/01/29
Re: Please test gub, Federico Bruni, 2019/01/29
Re: Please test gub, Thomas Morley, 2019/01/29
Re: Please test gub, Knut Petersen, 2019/01/30
Re: Please test gub, Alexander Kobel, 2019/01/31
- Re: Please test gub, Knut Petersen, 2019/01/31
- Re: Please test gub, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/31
- Re: Please test gub, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/31
- Re: Please test gub, Alexander Kobel, 2019/01/31
- Re: Please test gub, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/01/31
- Re: Please test gub, Alexander Kobel, 2019/01/31
- Re: Please test gub, Karlin High, 2019/01/31