Re: compilation with clang

[David Kastrup]

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

> ./include/translator.hh:78:3: note:
>     expanded from macro 'TRANSLATOR_FAMILY_DECLARATIONS'
>   DECLARE_TRANSLATOR_CALLBACKS (NAME);                                  \
>   ^
> ./include/translator.hh:97:14: note:
>     expanded from macro 'DECLARE_TRANSLATOR_CALLBACKS'
>   static SCM method_finder () {                                         \
>              ^
> ======================================================================
>
> Looking around in the internet it seems that this is a real problem,
> violating the C++11 standard, cf.
>
>   
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33872039/invalid-explicitly-specified-argument-in-clang-but-successful-compilation-in-gcc
>
> Unfortunately, I'm completely stuck with a fix – my C++ knowledge is
> simply too limited.  Anyone here who could help?

I thought that they had fixed this.  Rewriting this in a manner not
relying on the C++11 (and earlier IIRC) resolution rules is not all that
feasible: this is really heavily making use of it.  You'd have to do the
whole method finding business in a completely different manner.

-- 
David Kastrup