Re: Non-quadratic form of whiteout

[David Kastrup]

Lukas-Fabian Moser <address@hidden> writes:

> This is exactly what I implemented (tried to implement).
>
>
>> A pair-list like '((1 . 2)(3 . 4)) would extent the whiteout-amount in
>> x-axis with the values of the first pair, in y-axis with the values of
>> the second pair.
>>
>
> Good idea! But wouldn't it be cleaner to use a pair of pairs instead of a
> list of pairs?

The print syntax of ((1 . 2) . (3 . 4)) is ((1 . 2) 3 . 4)

Pairs of pairs tend to lead to awful print forms.

-- 
David Kastrup