[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590
From: |
pkx166h |
Subject: |
Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 04:09:34 -0800 |
On 2018/02/23 11:18:38, Be-3 wrote:
On 2018/02/23 07:30:00, lemzwerg wrote:
> LGTM, thanks!
In my opinion, there's a misplacement of rest dots. Therefore,
file scm/output-lib.scm (dots::calc-staff-position)
will have to be adapted, too (see related image and comment in issue
#5277)
There's no appropriate code for log > 7 (the new rest glyphs)
Are we simply seeing another symptom of something I (when patch testing)
have to now ignore?
See the thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-09/msg00013.html
James
https://codereview.appspot.com/336590043/
- add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden), thomasmorley65, 2018/02/21
- Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden), lilypond, 2018/02/22
- Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2018/02/23
- Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden), torsten . haemmerle, 2018/02/23
- Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden), lilypond, 2018/02/23
- Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden),
pkx166h <=
- Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden), lilypond, 2018/02/23
- Re: add glyphs for 256th, 512th and 1024th flags and rests (issue 336590043 by address@hidden), torsten . haemmerle, 2018/02/23