Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?

[Étienne Beaulé]

There isn't anything else to the option that I can think of; it does
exactly what I intended it to do, nothing more or less. So, I'd keep it in
the current form. I can't really see how else it could fit in the code
without problems arising.

Étienne

2017-11-13 4:54 GMT-04:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:

> Tomohiro Tatejima <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I found that the -dcrop option (Issue 5165) is not included in
> > stable/2.20 branch although the feature is listed in the changes
> > document.
> >
> > Will it be included in 2.20? or upcoming 2.21 (and therefore the entry
> > of the documentation should be removed)?
>
> I've taken a look.  Currently I am undecided.  The code is separated
> well enough and clearly does not get exercised without specifying the
> option.  So it's not going to harm existing functionality.  I am not
> sure it will stay around in exactly this form.  But, well, that's a weak
> argument against it.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>