[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 3960 discussion
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 3960 discussion |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:31:29 +0100 |
James wrote: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 11:54 AM
>- **status**: Started --> Invalid
> - **Patch**: needs_work -->
> - **Comment**:
>
> Revisiting this, the example given at the start of this issue
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/explicit-breaks
>
> has no corresponding entry at all in the 2.19 documentation. In fact the
> entire NR 4.x section is completely different.
>
> The example in the 2.18 is for overriding when LilyPond doesn't honour a
> manual `\break` or `\pagebreak` command by using
> `NonMusicalPaperColumn.line-break-permission` overrides. The 2.19 doc doesn't
> mention any example or even snippet. It does have one mention about
> `line-break-permission` but only in the context of what the setting does and
> what its defaults are.
This section was changed significantly in Oct 2014when the various
\auto..breaks.. commands were installed. See
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4169/
> So I wonder now if this tracker is still needed.
so marking this invalid is correct.
Trevor
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 3960 discussion,
Trevor Daniels <=