[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60
|
From: |
Andrew Bernard |
|
Subject: |
Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2017 17:52:09 +1000 |
Reverting to 2.19.59 shows no problem. This sounds like a regression.
Andrew
On 10 May 2017 at 17:44, Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> wrote:
> And now I observe they are rotated in a plain PDF viewer also. So
> Frescobaldi is not part of the plot.
>
> Andrew
>
>
- Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Andrew Bernard, 2017/05/10
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Andrew Bernard, 2017/05/10
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60,
Andrew Bernard <=
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Phil Holmes, 2017/05/10
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, David Kastrup, 2017/05/10
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Andrew Bernard, 2017/05/10
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Andrew Bernard, 2017/05/10
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Simon Albrecht, 2017/05/10
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Andrew Bernard, 2017/05/11
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, David Kastrup, 2017/05/11
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Andrew Bernard, 2017/05/11
- Re: Paper rotated in 2.19.60, Urs Liska, 2017/05/11