[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/* |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2016 08:11:59 -0600 |
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Knut Petersen
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 16.12.2016 um 14:38 schrieb Urs Liska:
>>
>>
>>> As your knowledge of scheme seems to be well developed, could you give
>>> a scheme equivalent of
>>>
>>> forceExtender = { \once \override LyricExtender.force-extender = ##t }
>>>
>>> that is acceptable to lilypond?
>>
>> #(once (overrideProperty '(LyricExtender force-extender) #t))
>>
>> (untested)
>
> Thanks a lot for the quick answer. If I put
>
> (define-public (forceExtender)
> (once (overrideProperty '(LyricExtender force-extender) #t)))
>
> into scm/music-functions.scm, lilypond does know \forceExtender ... but it
> complains about a "non-music expression"
> if it is used ...
If you are defining a music function, do it in ly/music-functions-init.ly,
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, (continued)
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Marc Hohl, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Urs Liska, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*,
David Nalesnik <=
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Urs Liska, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, David Nalesnik, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Trevor Daniels, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Trevor Daniels, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Trevor Daniels, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/15