[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GSoC] spanners project update
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: [GSoC] spanners project update |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:58:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
Am 30.06.2016 um 14:47 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>>> How does that differ from symbols?
>> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as
>> LilyPond code, isn't it?
> Can you give an example for symbols "entered as LilyPond code" as
> opposed to "in the Scheme domain"?
Ah, I mean
#(define %9sn5@ "a")
%9sn5@ = "a"
but ...
>
> Do you mean "without using #" here? Why would it be relevant to XML how
> you entered a symbol?
of course that doesn't matter here as you can always write
\override NoteHead.id = #'09fjwg@
Well, *now* it doesn't work because it expects a string, but it's not
the symbol restriction.
Sorry for the noise.
Urs
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, (continued)
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/06/26
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, Nathan Chou, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, Nathan Chou, 2016/06/30
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, David Kastrup, 2016/06/30
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, Urs Liska, 2016/06/30
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, David Kastrup, 2016/06/30
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, Urs Liska, 2016/06/30
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, David Kastrup, 2016/06/30
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, Urs Liska, 2016/06/30
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, David Kastrup, 2016/06/30
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: [GSoC] spanners project update, David Kastrup, 2016/06/30