|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Ghostscript 9.15 |
Date: | Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:43:23 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
Am 25.03.2015 um 07:50 schrieb David Kastrup:
We don't use any particular font for sans-serif and monospace. LilyPond simply calls the OS's default here. Which is something I'd like to raise (once more?): Would it be an option to find suitable complementing fonts here, ship them with LilyPond and make them the default? I think chances that a default sans-serif is anywhere near visually suitable for a LilyPond score are pretty small. Usually they are chosen for very different purposes (i.e. clean screen display for user interfaces). While I think DejaVu Sans (default here) is a good font for its purposes it's really ugly when used in a LilyPond score.So that’s probably a matter of the font, not of its style - not every >font defines ligatures, and the name „TakaoPGothic“ tells me its main >focus would be Japanese (is this true?), so the designers probably >didn’t put so much work in features of Latin script. > >Would you care to try a different font?Well, why would the sans-serif font be TakaoPGothic in the first place? I think we should be using the same default fonts on every installation.
Urs
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |