|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: thoughts on changing \magnifyMusic, please comment |
Date: | Sat, 02 Aug 2014 17:14:33 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
Am 02.08.2014 11:35, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Now with requests for absolute and relative versions, as >well as this: > > \temporary \magnifyStaff 1.3 > ... > \undo \magnifyStaff 1.3 > >...I'm starting to wonder how much of this is really >necessary. Can anyone provide an actual use case to justify >accommodating either of these requests?I admit that i don't have an actual use case. I expect that crazy composers like Mike (hello Mike! :)) could want to make the staff progressively bigger and bigger each measure, for example as a fancy way of indicating global crescendo sustained over many measures. But that's just a speculation.>
I don't have concrete examples either, but I can think of two practical use cases: Temporarily changing staff size may be useful in pedagogical sheets. And you could make it useful when writing "dialogue" like parts, i.e. when two or more instruments or singers sing/play alternatingly. Then it may be helpful for sight-reading when your own part is on maginfied parts of the staff.
Urs -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |