[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Website questions: GSoC
From: |
Paul Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Website questions: GSoC |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:03:14 -0800 (PST) |
David Kastrup wrote
> I suggest to let the topic of the _last_ GSoC rest until there are more
> tangible results. That concerns the "Janek's GSoC work can legitimately
> be presented in a positive light" angle.
>
> That does neither mean leaving the page as it is currently, nor removing
> it completely. It just means that we should not try selling something
> as a success until we have more to show for it.
That makes sense to me. No need to either hide it as a "failure" or sell it
as a success before the results are in.
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Website-questions-GSoC-tp155646p155668.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Website questions: GSoC, Urs Liska, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, Urs Liska, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, Paul Morris, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, Urs Liska, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, David Kastrup, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, Urs Liska, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, David Kastrup, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, Urs Liska, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC,
Paul Morris <=
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, Trevor Daniels, 2013/12/12
- Re: Website questions: GSoC, Urs Liska, 2013/12/12
Re: Website questions: GSoC, Graham Percival, 2013/12/13