[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
contributing instructions are misleading!
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
contributing instructions are misleading! |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:15:40 +0100 |
hi,
i'm infuriated. A new contributor had turned up, read CG and sent his
patch to the "frogs" mailing list, which, as far as i know, is dead
(and since lilynet is down, i'm not sure it's actually working at
all).
This is absolutely unacceptable. Not only is our contributing process
complicated, but the instructions we give are misleading!
I'm so angry that I'll actually go through the CG and update the
instructions right now, and will push directly to staging. I don't
want to waste time on discussions this time, and i dont' actually have
time to go through formal review. Any comments and adjustments are
welcome - please just send follow-up patches.
If anyone doesn't like what i'm going to do, please protest swiftly.
best,
Janek
- contributing instructions are misleading!,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, James, 2013/12/07
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, Phil Holmes, 2013/12/07
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, Janek Warchoł, 2013/12/09
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, David Kastrup, 2013/12/10
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, Janek Warchoł, 2013/12/11
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, Graham Percival, 2013/12/11
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, Carl Peterson, 2013/12/11
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, Graham Percival, 2013/12/11
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, Carl Peterson, 2013/12/11
- Re: contributing instructions are misleading!, Graham Percival, 2013/12/11