[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:58:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913 |
On 11/27/13 8:45 AM, "Urs Liska" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Am 27.11.2013 16:36, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, "Urs Liska" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> For me this sounds good.
>>> Requiring to write \include "original-breaks.ly" is significantly
>>>better
>>> than requiring to define the commands.
>>> But it would still need a separate switch, presumably through the
>>> command line.
>> This is true, but it would be possible to put the appropriate command
>>line
>> switch in Frescobaldi and to access it by means of a check box, right?
>
>Right, that's not the issue. We can pass command line options,
>expressions or include files from Frescobaldi (that's what we already do
>with the Layout Control Options).
>But we would have to make the commands in the include file respond to
>that switch, and IISC we'd be back at the specific use case that
>offended David.
define a tag "original-break"
Use the tag "original-break" in the definition of originalBreak in the
include file original-breaks.ly
Have a command-line switch that says --t original-break (or the
equivalent).
Have a general use case that says "we can define tags to be kept or
excluded from the command line".
Now we have the general use case that David wants and a straightforward
means of getting the specific use case that Urs wants.
Is this a problem? It seems to me like the outline of a complete solution.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, David Kastrup, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, David Kastrup, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Urs Liska, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, David Kastrup, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Carl Sorensen, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Urs Liska, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Carl Sorensen, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Urs Liska, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, David Kastrup, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Urs Liska, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Urs Liska, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, David Kastrup, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Urs Liska, 2013/11/27
- Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, David Kastrup, 2013/11/27
Re: Suggestion: Keep original breaks, Trevor Daniels, 2013/11/27