Re: Black mensural notehead bug

[David Kastrup]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 5:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Black mensural notehead bug
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> This looks wrong to me:
>>>
>>> \relative c'' {
>>> \override NoteHead.style = #'mensural
>>> \cadenzaOn
>>> s1 a \longa a \breve a1 \bar "|"
>>> \override NoteHead.style = #'blackmensural
>>> s1 a \longa a \breve a1 \bar "|"
>>> }
>>
>> There is no blackmensural style as such as far as I can see.  Do you
>> mean blackpetrucci?
>
> There are glyphs - for example noteheads.sM1blackmensural so I guessed
> the style.

Guessing is your privilege, but as long as you don't guess something
supported by the manuals, I don't see anything that can be called a bug.

> It seems to me you shouldn't need to select a petrucci style to get
> these glyphs?

Petrucci uses mensural noteheads scaled to a different size.  So it's
not that surprising that Blackpetrucci uses blackmensural noteheads.

So we have any other style using _those_ noteheads?

-- 
David Kastrup