Re: untangling the remaining regressions

[Mike Solomon]

On 14 août 2013, at 09:58, Keith OHara <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> 
> Mike posted three patches to issue 3385 that attempted to go halfway
> backwards, partially restoring the pure-relevant? test, but these
> ran into regressions.
> 
> Going forward would be to make the pure versions of these functions, 
> actually work properly before line-breaking, without triggering other
> calculations prematurely (i.e., make them acually 'pure').

I think my most recent patch set for 3385 does this.

Cheers,
MS