Re: Strange cautionary

[Keith OHara]

Phil Holmes <mail <at> philholmes.net> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eluze" <eluzew <at> gmail.com>
> To: <lilypond-devel <at> gnu.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Strange cautionary
> 
> > Phil Holmes wrote
> >> What's the cautionary on the 3rd beat of the second bar doing there?
> 
> > after reading all this I feel the current behavior is correct
> 
> It also disappears if you get rid of the ties in the previous bar, left 
> hand.  If it's not there without the tie, surely it shouldn't be there with 
> the tie?

Traditionally we would print an accidental if the out-of-key note repeats
in the same octave after a tie.  LilyPond extends this concept to the
cautionaries she prints in other octaves, but I agree it is not necessary.
I tried to make a clear example for issue 3466