Re: References to publications in the docs

[Federico Bruni]

2013/7/13 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>

We currently refer to Gardner Read and others in the NR under the very sparsely populated Contemporary Music section of the NR:

http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/further-reading-and-scores-of-interest

It strikes me that this would be better at the end of section 1 of the LM:

http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/learning/overview-of-manuals

"Further reading", plus adding at the very least Elaine Gould's book.  Does anyone disagree?

BTW, shouldn't the node title be included inside the @ignore?

@node Scores and musical examples

@unnumberedsubsubsec Scores and musical examples

@ignore

    Rough list of composers whose work could be included

    (in alphabetical order, perhaps with suggested work):

        Pierre Boulez (Le Marteau Sans Maître?)

        John Cage (Freeman Etudes?)

        George Crumb (Black Angels?)

        Brian Ferneyhough (Transit?  Time & Motion Studies?)

        Ben Johnston (extended just intonation example)

        György Ligeti (several, including Hamburg Concerto)

        Krzysztof Penderecki (Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima?)

        Karlheinz Stockhausen (Gruppen?)

@end ignore

It was ignored from the very beginning (perhaps a kind of todo list):

commit 7df6ed01116dac2a8ea1babfb3f7184859ebf6c7

Author: Joseph Wakeling <address@hidden>

Date:   Sat Sep 5 22:30:58 2009 +0200

    Doc: Further Reading for contemporary music.