[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: issue 3441: banjo example should use Staff + TabStaff (issue 1093504
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: issue 3441: banjo example should use Staff + TabStaff (issue 10935046) |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Jul 2013 20:13:32 +0000 |
https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode1864
Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:1864: \override
Staff.StringNumber.stencil = ##f
On 2013/07/07 19:54:09, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I'm not sure about the \override
It surely looks better.
Though, our policy seems to be to put no \override into the NR, apart
from
situations where it's necassary.
One might argue it's not.
It makes a difference. At any rate, this is a case where
\omit Staff.StringNumber
would be less obscure.
At any rate, I consider it a mistake to put the sets/overrides into the
music. The problem is that they will likely create spurious staffs.
https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/