Re: issue 3441: banjo example should use Staff + TabStaff (issue 10935046)

[dak]

https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode1864
Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:1864: \override
Staff.StringNumber.stencil = ##f
On 2013/07/07 19:54:09, thomasmorley651 wrote:

> I'm not sure about the \override
> It surely looks better.
> Though, our policy seems to be to put no \override into the NR, apart
from
> situations where it's necassary.
> One might argue it's not.

It makes a difference.  At any rate, this is a case where
\omit Staff.StringNumber
would be less obscure.

At any rate, I consider it a mistake to put the sets/overrides into the
music.  The problem is that they will likely create spurious staffs.

https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/