lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NR incorrect now?


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: NR incorrect now?
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:10:13 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> The NR says "In accordance with standard typesetting rules, a natural
> sign is printed before a sharp or flat if a previous accidental on the
> same note needs to be canceled. To change this behavior, set the
> extraNatural property to f in the Staff context."
>
> Following http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1481 I
> believe this is no longer exact.  Anyone disagree?

Huh?  The above passage does not seem to apply to key signatures at all.
And indeed issue 1481 was about not letting extraNatural influence key
signatures.

Key signatures are not "accidentals".  They are at best "accidentals
waiting to happen".

-- 
David Kastrup




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]