[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bar-line.scm
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: bar-line.scm |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:30:49 +0200 |
On 21 févr. 2013, at 01:11, Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2013/2/20 Marc Hohl <address@hidden>:
>
>> David convinced me that staying with ly: is the best way to go.
>>
>> Marc
>
> Yep.
> And I'm still convinced.
> Changing it would break too much.
>
> OTOH, in IR 4. we list scheme-functions all prefixed with ly:
> I remember looking for a certain function to manipulate stencils,
> searching all the ly:stencil-...-functions in IR.
> Without success.
> In the end I found `stencil-whiteout´ in /scm/stencil.scm.
>
> What about _documenting_ some/all of them in IR, too?
>
> -Harm
Hey Harm,
I am cool with whatever - mostly, I just wanted to know the rule for one or the
other so I can find them faster. It is a time saver to know where certain
things are stashed, but it's certainly not a big problem.
Cheers,
MS