[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:11:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> As with the Bug Squad procedures ("find any excuse to reject a report,
> put the onus on the reporter to clarify the report"), I heartily
> encourage the Patch Meister to put the onus on the patch submitter to
> wait patiently or fix whatever needs fixing. Since we have relatively
> few active developers, I think that being conservative here is not a
> bad thing.
The problem is that patch submissions are not independent, and Rietveld
does not facilitate reviewing a branch substructured into patches. As a
result, if a single developer has three related issues on review while
five co-dependent issues are accumulating on his computer, in a manner
of speaking, things are easy to get tied into knots. For independent
submissions, there is no real problem with letting them travel the
pipelines regularly.
--
David Kastrup
- who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/19
- Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, James, 2013/02/19
- Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, David Kastrup, 2013/02/19
- Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, Thomas Morley, 2013/02/19
- Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, James, 2013/02/20
- Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, David Kastrup, 2013/02/20
- Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, Graham Percival, 2013/02/20
- Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/20
Re: who is doing patch-review -> patch-countdown, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/19