Re: [talk] suggestion: redesign "sponsoring" page.

[Janek Warchoł]

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Yes.  We had a long discussion leading to the current phrasing of
> the "general text" on the sponsoring page.  I am skeptical about
> any need to change it.

Well, this topic wasn't a part of GOP and it seems that it wasn't
discussed publicly.  The only information i found about it was this:

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Following a few weeks of private discussions, I have added a page
> for sponsorships / bounties:
> http://lilypond.org/sponsoring.html
> We may be making some small tweaks to the text on that page, and
> also some changes to the gitstats are on the way.

I'm fine with discussing things privately, but i believe that
decisions made privately should be open for discussing again if
circumstances change.

In this case, almost a year has passed since above decision, and the
circumstances are different: for half a year now we've been funding
one full-time developer, and the outcome is somewhat between a success
and a failure: David is still with us, but he's barely able to make
ends meet. And it seems that the sponsorship page could do better with
regard to encouraging people to support LilyPond financially.

So, I don't understand at all why you are "skeptical about any need to
change it".

Janek