Re: easier \noBeam syntax

[Janek Warchoł]

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:10 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Joram Berger <address@hidden> writes:
>> It's no real problem, just wanted to mention it. The idea came up while
>> making a cheat sheet and realizing, that [ and ] have no equally short
>> counterpart.
>
> So the main use case would seem to be a prettier cheat sheet.  Wasting
> symbols or tokens on that seems excessive.

lol :)
I think that \noBeam isn't used often enough to justify a shorter
syntax.  Additionally, in my opinion it's better to have non-symbollic
names for commands that make something disappear.

Janek