|
From: | Marc Hohl |
Subject: | Re: Scheme indentation |
Date: | Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:33:26 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 |
Am 30.10.2012 15:10, schrieb address@hidden:
On 30 oct. 2012, at 08:53, Marc Hohl <address@hidden> wrote:Hello list, several weeks ago, Graham was about to run the scheme indentation script on the sources – I asked him to wait until my bar line project has finished in order to make *my* life easier ;-) Now I'd like to do the reformatting work – should this go through Rietveld? It is an automatic task, but just to be sure I don't break anything, I think I feel safer with Rietveld. Are there any big changes planned on the scheme side of LilyPond, which would collide with the formatting issue? Regards, MarcI'd put it through the countdown just in case. I don't have any outstanding patches that this'd get in the way of.
Hello all, my strategy seems to fail: the patch is too big for being tested with patchythrough rietveld, so I sent it to James. It is about 1,5 megs, and applying failed
because meanwhile David had pushed the outstanding measure_counter_engraver patch. So I could rebase/make a patch/mail to James/wait for approval/... On the other hand: are there any objections to a) run the script over all files in scm/ b) do a 'make && make test && make doc' c) push the result (if b succeeds) directly to staging? Regards, Marc
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |