Re: Extent of automatic beams?

[address@hidden]

On 25 mai 2012, at 19:19, David Kastrup wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am currently rewriting footnote documentation, and I got the somewhat
> embarrassing screenshot
> 
> <autobeam.png>
> It would appear that the dimensions of the Beam grob are located at the
> note where LilyPond _decides_ where to end the beam, not where the beam
> then actually ends.
> 
> Anybody have a suggestion what might be at work here?  For what it is
> worth, this should pretty much be the behavior of the old
> \footnoteAutoGrob or whatever else it was called, too.
> 
> Manually entered beams seem unproblematic in comparison.
> 

Hey David,

Has it always been like this? Is it a regression? If so, do you know the commit 
that regressed it?
I can figure it out, but if you already have that info, it'll speed me up a 
lot.  Otherwise, I can do some snooping.

Cheers,
MS