[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053)
From: |
graham |
Subject: |
Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053) |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:06:41 +0000 |
The basic question is this: is this test helpful for programmers? At
first glance I'd say that it is, provided that you update the syntax as
David suggested.
IMO it takes a pretty silly example for something to *not* be a helpful
test case. Sure, having complicated scheme here might mean that future
changes to some scheme interfaces would need to update this file as
well, but IMO that's a perfectly legitimate function of a regtest!
Now, this test might be useful as a LSR snippet as well, so you may want
to consider sending it there (at least once LSR supports 2.16). Until
that happens, it could got to Documentation/snippets/new, but I
recommend asking James or Phil to handle that part of it.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5882053/
- Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053), plroskin, 2012/03/23
- Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053), dak, 2012/03/23
- Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053), dak, 2012/03/23
- Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053), plroskin, 2012/03/23
- Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053), dak, 2012/03/24
- Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053),
graham <=
- Re: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems (issue 5882053), graham, 2012/03/28