Re: Fix mordents and pralltriller in articulate.ly (issue 5784084)

[Graham Percival]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:49:29PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
> >>>>> "graham" == graham  <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> graham> ok.  In the future, when updating a patch, please point git-cl
> graham> at your existing issue (which was orginally 2404, but I'm
> graham> going to close 2404 and 2405 and leave 2406).
> 
> Can I do that in .git/config?

Unfortunately not.

>  It currently points at a Rietveld issue  5784084
>  --- I wasn't aware that there was a separate Lilypond issue number
>  name space.  Is git-cl meant to print out the new Lilypond issue number? 

git-cl will say "I can't find an issue number"; at that point,
manually type in 2406.

Hopefully somebody will add code.google-issue-number-tracking to
git-cl at some point, but that's not likely to happen soon.

> I think the (begin is unnecessary too.  I was a real novice scheme
> programmer when I wrote all this --- still am. The body of a let
> clause is already a list of fucntion calls.

Well, each patch will need to go through the review.  You could
let the current ones go through, then do more edits; or you could
cancel the current one, make more edits, then send a single patch
through.

- Graham