[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patchy email
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Patchy email |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:54:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> WTF? That's definitely something in the changes file. I checked this
>> and it compiled and I had code that made sure it compiled. With all the
>> rebasing to make this fit better I must have displaced the relevant
>> commit that explicitly makes this compile somehow after all. I'll be
>> pushing that ASAP and check the translations afterwards.
>
> I see your fix. However, I'm reluctant to run patchy-staging
> right now, since it would leave master broken in
> 1f0a00b69403290b7fc7527b9ab100f95533f954
> and fixed in
> 75d0e8cf509685df2e0ed5722803622258673c07
>
> True, we're unlikely to have git-bisect stop in between those two
> commits, but would it be possible for you to include the parser.yy
> fix in the relevant branch merge so that there isn't any danger
> when running git-bisect?
I'll try doing this without messing up again. 15 minutes or so at
least.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Patchy email, (continued)
- Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, James, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/01/28
- Re: Patchy email, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/28