[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checking 2240
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: checking 2240 |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:00:06 +0100 |
2012/1/22 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> why are you asking this question? Is the source code really
> *that* hard to read? It's 18 lines!
Hey, i'm not a pro programmer. There are so many brilliant
programmers here that my self-confidence is quite low; this is second
time i read Python and first time i read building scripts. And i
don't want to do some stupid mistake, break Patchy and cause
unexpected damage to origin/staging and/or origin/master, which would
result in more problems that i'm trying to solve.
> https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/blob/master/patches/compile_lilypond_test.py#L282
>
> for patch in patches:
> issue_id = patch[0]
> patch_filename = patch[1]
> title = patch[2]
> print "Trying %i with %s" % (issue_id, patch_filename)
> try:
> autoCompile.configure()
> autoCompile.patch(patch_filename)
> autoCompile.build(quick_make=True,
> issue_id=issue_id)
> autoCompile.regtest_check(issue_id)
> autoCompile.copy_regtests(issue_id)
> autoCompile.make_regtest_show_script(issue_id,
> title)
> # reverse stuff
> autoCompile.patch(patch_filename, reverse=True)
> autoCompile.regtest_clean(issue_id)
> autoCompile.clean(issue_id)
> except Exception as err:
> print "Problem with issue %i" % issue_id
> print err
Yes, i've read this 2 times. If i didn't i wouldn't ask the question.
Janek.
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, (continued)
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- checking 2240 (was: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent), Graham Percival, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240 (was: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent), address@hidden, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, David Kastrup, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: checking 2240, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, David Kastrup, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, David Kastrup, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, David Kastrup, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/22