|
From: | janek . lilypond |
Subject: | Re: Fix issue 2228: Add option for strictBeatBeaming (issue 5556054) |
Date: | Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:16:23 +0000 |
LGTM. I'm not sure if the word "flags" should be used here. http://codereview.appspot.com/5556054/diff/2001/input/regression/beamlet-point-toward-beat.ly File input/regression/beamlet-point-toward-beat.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5556054/diff/2001/input/regression/beamlet-point-toward-beat.ly#newcode6 input/regression/beamlet-point-toward-beat.ly:6: belong. The first beam avoids sticking out flags (the default); "sticking out beamlets" i think? http://codereview.appspot.com/5556054/diff/2001/scm/define-context-properties.scm File scm/define-context-properties.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5556054/diff/2001/scm/define-context-properties.scm#newcode480 scm/define-context-properties.scm:480: beat structure even if it causes flags to hang out?") "even if it causes flags" ...beamlets? http://codereview.appspot.com/5556054/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |