Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent

[Carl Sorensen]

On 1/21/12 11:16 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:

>Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 1/21/12 10:37 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>I have actually found out that I promised too much about string numbers
>>>appearing on isolated notes: since the string number events _are_
>>>listened to (likely by the tabstaff engraver team), the rhythmic music
>>>iterator _does_ broadcast them instead of leaving them as articulations.
>>
>> The tabstaff engraver team listens to *both* string number events *and*
>> articulations. Combining the two is a bit of a pain.
>
>If nobody listens to string number events, they will stay articulations
>except when placed explicitly on chords like <c>\3 and then you deserve
>what you don't get.
>
>> That's why I asked earlier to get some consistency.  If we can get
>> string number events to always be in articulations, we don't need to
>> broadcast string number events.  If the rhythmic music iterator can
>> make them always show up as articulations, that would be great.
>
>That would be the case.

Great!  I'll make tabstaff engraver stop listening to string number events
once your patch is pushed.

Thanks,

Carl