Re: Patchy email

[Graham Percival]

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:48:49AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> Since there isn't much interest in cleaning
> up compiler warnings[1] so that we can use automatic tools to
> identify such problematic occurrences, I guess we'll just stumble
> forward as usual.
> 
> [1] if your version of g++ doesn't find a ton of warnings -- on
> any architecture -- try using clang 3.0.

This is a general form of "your" to mean "any person", not aimed
specifically at David.

- Graham