[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB target_cpu error
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: GUB target_cpu error |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:23:35 +0100 |
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I didn't look at the patch(es). If that's all this is, then let's
> just get rid of it. Unix shells are case-sensitive; if somebody
> doesn't know that yet, they'll discover it pretty quickly.
Actually, this was a totally unnecessary precaution. I've never heard
of any *nix system where uname -m would return X86_64 or I686 instead
of their lower-case counterparts.
I used case-insensitivity in the first version of my patch, that used
target_architecture instead of target_cpu. Then I switched to
target_cpu for simplicity, and forgot to get rid of the whole shopt
business.
Bottom line: let's get rid of it already.
Cheers,
Valentin.
- GUB target_cpu error, Graham Percival, 2010/11/26
- Re: GUB target_cpu error, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/27
- Re: GUB target_cpu error, Graham Percival, 2010/11/27
- Re: GUB target_cpu error, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/28
- Re: GUB target_cpu error, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/28
- Re: GUB target_cpu error, Graham Percival, 2010/11/29
- Re: GUB target_cpu error, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/29
- Re: GUB target_cpu error, Graham Percival, 2010/11/29
- Re: GUB target_cpu error,
Valentin Villenave <=