[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:51:17 -0600 |
On 11/6/10 6:46 PM, "Mark Polesky" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>> 9) initial-separation
>>> * longer but describes the meaning more accurately now
>>> we have an item-item-spacing format
>>>
>>> I vote for 8 or 9.
>>
>> 9.
>
> Does this entail changing 'minimum-distance to
> 'minimum-separation? I prefer both to use the same noun.
Yes, I'm OK with minimum-separation, where separation is the separation
between reference points.
But I'm fine with 8 as well -- with all the work we've done on distance it
may be better to just stay with distance.
Carl
- Renaming the 'space alist-key, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/06
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/06
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/06
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/06
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/06
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, David Kastrup, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Patrick McCarty, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/07
- Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/07