[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
problematic commit 02fe038744e634b42f1a3377c4f0dc3d25e80344
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
problematic commit 02fe038744e634b42f1a3377c4f0dc3d25e80344 |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:43:21 +0100 |
I would have liked to see this in codereview before it showed up in git master.
changes.tely:
- why is \include "still recommended"?
pitches.itely:
- if \include is still recommended, then why is \language discussed first?
- I see a @noindent, which is heavily discouraged by the doc policy.
- I see @exmaples, which are also discouraged by the doc policy.
- does \language support scoping? If so, it would be nice to see that
discussed.
- perhaps we should not consider arabic.ly as a "language", but rather
as an "instrument (or music) style", like bagpipes.ly or gregorian.ly.
If so, then this is the appropriate time to discuss it.
- Graham
- problematic commit 02fe038744e634b42f1a3377c4f0dc3d25e80344,
Graham Percival <=