[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3 |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:15:01 -0700 |
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 05:38:20PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> --) Two scripts still have "/usr/bin/python" lines
>> (python/auxiliar/manuals_definitions.py, and scripts/build/pytt.py).
>> Those should be changed to "@PYTHON@", right?
>
> python/ yes, since it's not something that people call manually.
> But stuff in scripts/build/ shouldn't have @PYTHON@, otherwise
> it'll bork if you call it manually.
Um, I should have phrased my question differently:
Most python scripts in python/ and scripts/ use @PYTHON@,
@TARGET_PYTHON@, or "/usr/bin/env python". There are two exceptions,
one in python/ and one in scripts/, that use a fixed path to the
executable (/usr/bin/python). If you do a "git grep", you'll see what
I mean.
Are these two scripts special, or should they be changed to use @PYTHON@ ?
Thanks,
Patrick
Re: Distributions upgrading to Python 3, Benjamin Peterson, 2010/10/17