[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:16:41 -0600 |
On 10/6/10 9:46 AM, "Mark Polesky" <address@hidden> wrote:
> I also think the name 'space is misleading; I propose
> 'default-distance. Opinions?
So then we'd have, for each item-item-spacing entry
default-distance -- the non-stretched distance between the upper item
reference point and the lower item reference point.
minimum-distance -- the minimum distance between the upper item reference
point and the lower item reference point
padding -- the minimum amount of whitespace between the bottom of the upper
item and the the top of the lower item
stretchability -- a parameter that affects how much the separation between
the items will be adjusted in order to accommodate the page layout.
That sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Carl
P.S. It seems to me that at one point Joe mentioned there was a different
default for stretchability for tension and compression. If that's the case,
should we have a 'stretchability and a 'compressibility?
- names of vertical spacing dimensions, Mark Polesky, 2010/10/04
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, Mark Polesky, 2010/10/06
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, Trevor Daniels, 2010/10/06
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, Alexander Kobel, 2010/10/07
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/07
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, Valentin Villenave, 2010/10/07
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/07
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, Alexander Kobel, 2010/10/07
- Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, David Kastrup, 2010/10/07
Re: names of vertical spacing dimensions, Mark Polesky, 2010/10/07