[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @lilypond[fragment] question
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: @lilypond[fragment] question |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:17:22 +0100 |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Benkő Pál <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Nope. My pet name for Ancient music is "the disaster that nobody
>> cares about fixing".
>
> I do care (well, I am nobody and even I don't care for chant)
> and have my pet issues, but I really don't know what other issues
> there are - searching for "ancient" in the issues list gives a
> very short list and none of it is related to mensural notation;
> I'd love to hear about them.
Ok, here you go:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1287
... oh, upon re-reading my comment, I realize that it wasn't clear
that I was talking about the doc section. In the context of
documentation editors, I think it's ok, but non-doc people have been
misled by this.
I was talking about Notation 2.9 Ancient notation.
Cheers,
- Graham
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: @lilypond[fragment] question,
Graham Percival <=