[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:07:37 -0700 (PDT) |
David Kastrup wrote:
> While a rationale is strictly not necessary in a bunch of
> instructions, it will do wonders for morale and
> acceptance.
David,
I guess I didn't think morale was an issue here... Anyway,
would you prefer this change to be made?
@item
@code{@@address@hidden@address@hidden --- Use for metasyntactic variables (such
as @address@hidden, @address@hidden, @address@hidden, etc.).
-When referring to variables in the text, use
+In the PDF and HTML output, variables should appear in a monospace
+font (to indicate that they are elements of program code). So
+when referring to variables in the text, use
@code{@@address@hidden@@address@hidden@address@hidden@}}, unless the
@code{@@address@hidden@address@hidden is already within another fixed-width
-command such as @code{@@address@hidden@address@hidden
+command such as @code{@@address@hidden@address@hidden or @code{@@example}.
- Mark
- Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, (continued)
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Graham Percival, 2010/09/21
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/24
Re: Doc fixes for \applyOutput ... ok to push?, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/25