Re: Typos in English manual

[Werner LEMBERG]

> Actually I am not sure that 'i.e.,' is necessary. 'i.e,' is not
> correct, so 'i.e.' without a comma is fine as far as I know.

Well, `i.e.' is a shorthand for the Latin `id est' which translates to
`that is', and for the latter, you always need a comma after the `is'
if you continue with a sentence, right?  So I think `i.e.' needs a
comma.


    Werner