Re: [PATCH] fix to issue 1116

[Neil Puttock]

On 30 July 2010 15:11, Mike Solomon <address@hidden> wrote:

> This solution works for the minimal example given with the issue, and it
> works in general if one accepts the assumption that there is no reason that
> anything fed through stack-lines (in scm/stencil.scm) should have an X
> extent whose left boundary is anything other than 0.  However, I
> don'tunderstand lilypond well enough to know:
>
> a) if this is a good assumption
> b) if this assumption breaks something else.

You'll probably be interested in Alexander Kobel's patch for this
(http://codereview.appspot.com/1689041/show).

Cheers,
Neil