[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:35:09 -0600 |
On 7/9/10 2:34 PM, "Neil Puttock" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 9 July 2010 21:02, Joseph Wakeling <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Neil -- thanks ever so much for the detailed explanations.
>
> You're welcome.
>
> I hope what I've said is correct, since Carl's pinched my post and
> added it to the Contributor's Guide. :)
Yes, but it's only in LilyPond miscellany, so it's really not important ;)
BTW, are you OK with me pushing the auto-beaming stuff?
Thanks,
Carl
- Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/08
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/09
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/09
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Neil Puttock, 2010/07/11
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/10
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/10
- Re: Chromatic transposition -- a very small starting step, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/07/11