Re: Revised autobeam settings patch (issue1682049)

[n . puttock]

On 2010/07/07 05:55:07, Carl wrote:

> > (seeing as this naming convention will have to be changed)?

> What does this mean?

I can't remember where I read it, but I was under the impression that
once GLISS starts, we'd have to think about deprecating the use of
`override' and `revert' as part of single commands (save for
\overrideProperty of course)

> Do you really want me to rename the file, or was that just for
consistency?  My
> current fix is to add the comma back in.

I was just thinking of LSR migration once it has a version bump, but if
you'd like to improve the title, then go ahead.

> I wanted to rename this file, so I did
> (Documentation/snippets/new/subdividing-beams.ly).  I al

> What do I do to get rid of the old name in Documentation/snippets?  Do

> I make Documentation/snippets/new/sub-dividing-beams.ly with a markup
> that says "THis snippet has been renamed"?

No, just move the snippets, change the titles and emend the
@lilypondfile references.  Then you can do a local update.

Once a full update's done, the old names in
the snippet list files will be deleted (though you can delete them
manually if you prefer.)

Cheers,
Neil


http://codereview.appspot.com/1682049/show