[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Release numbers [was Re: CG chapter 2, first draft]
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Release numbers [was Re: CG chapter 2, first draft] |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:57:34 +0100 |
Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 12:31 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit :
> now that John's
> updated stable, I need to drop that work and start figuring out how to
> get GUB to make 2.12.3-2.
Why not releasing a 2.12.4 instead? Revision numbers (third number of
the version number) are cheap, aren't they, and release numbers (-0, -1,
-2 etc.) are only supposed to denote a difference between different
builds of the *same* sources (i.e. same Git committish of LilyPond
sources branch), aren't they? It must also save you work on GUB or at
least put down its priority so you can work on more urgent tasks.
Cheers,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, (continued)
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Patrick McCarty, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Patrick McCarty, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, John Mandereau, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/13
Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Graham Percival, 2010/01/12
Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Graham Percival, 2010/01/12
Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/11
Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Graham Percival, 2010/01/13