[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autobeaming
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Autobeaming |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:53:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-16-generic; KDE/4.3.4; i686; ; ) |
Am Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2009 12:27:25 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Hans Aberg <address@hidden> writes:
> > Take tuplets. If there are quintuplets, then it should be a 5' unless
> > specified as typically 2'+3' or 3'+2'.
> >
> > For sextuplets, there is a convention that the should be in 3, so
> > there is an implicit rule 3'+3' - there should be no subbeaming of the
> > 3'. But a compose might want to change that.
>
> I am not sure I understand that. Why use sextuplets when you could just
> use triplets as 3'+3'? I should think that sextuplets make most sense
> when you need 2'+2'+2' as a rhythmic pattern.
In several violin parts, sextuplets are real sextuplets without any
subdividing. The beaming should also span all six notes in that case.
Cheers,
Reinhld
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/29
- Re: Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/29
- Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/29
- Re: Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/29
- Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/30
- Re: Autobeaming, David Kastrup, 2009/12/30
- Re: Autobeaming,
Reinhold Kainhofer <=
- Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/30
- Re: Autobeaming, Hans Aberg, 2009/12/30