[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google displays 2.9 doc
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Google displays 2.9 doc |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:56:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:
> Op donderdag 12-11-2009 om 08:55 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef David
> Kastrup:
>> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> > I'm not sure the solution to remove al older v2.9 etc. from google is
>> > a smart thing to do.
>>
>> I think it is much better than the alternatives.
>
> Does that include the alternative: Google fixes their alpha/numerical
> sorting blunder (v2.9 is bigger and thus more important than v2.12)?
Yes.
> Possibly we can help google with that, by adding a date to each page.
> Possibly there is another way to make google favour v2.12 pages over
> v2.9 without having to pull v2.9 alltogether?
Putting v2.9 into robots.txt does not "pull v2.9 alltogether". It means
that only _we_ rather than search engines will link to it, and can tell
people just _what_ to expect when following those links.
--
David Kastrup
- Google displays 2.9 doc, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/11
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/11
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/11
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/12
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/12
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Google displays 2.9 doc, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12