[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme
|
From: |
Neil Puttock |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:38:50 +0100 |
2009/8/26 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> The patch looks good to me.
Cheers.
> You code the empty list as (list). I typically code the empty list as '().
>
> It there a preference? I suspect that we ought to be consistent, although
> it's not highly important. It could be part of the code janitor work,
> though.
It's just something I noticed in a few places internally (these all
seem to be changes made by Nicolas) and thought it was clearer, though
admittedly I haven't been particularly consistent when deciding
between the two forms. :)
Regards,
Neil
- [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/19
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/25
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/26
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/08/27
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Nicolas Sceaux, 2009/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, David Kastrup, 2009/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Nicolas Sceaux, 2009/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme, David Kastrup, 2009/08/30